Calendrier

Novembre 2009
L M M J V S D
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
<< < > >>

Pages

Recherche

HAITI & VENEZUELA--COUP & EMPIRE par un acteur de l'histoire



(Part I)

by
 Stan Goff

© Copyright 2004, From The Wilderness Publications, www.fromthewilderness.com. All Rights Reserved. May be reprinted, distributed or posted on an Internet web site for non-profit purposes only.

[In this two-part  analysis, Stan Goff exposes the underlying forces  driving the current crisis in Haiti. The recent  coup d'etat is only the latest in two centuries  of violent transfers of power in that country – but  today the regional balance of forces is refreshingly  new. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has foiled  a series of desperate CIA attempts to gain control  of that oil-producing nation. While the Bush  administration arrogantly plays the same the  old game in the same old way, using the same  old felons and convicted murderers, new rules  are being written by an awakening transnational  solidarity in the hemisphere. Markets, privatization  of natural resources, drug routes, cheap labor – all  are at stake in the US elite's scramble for Haiti.  But Goff shows how an even more important motivation  is stinging the Bush junta into frenzied action:  when white supremacy is symbolically wounded,  others have to bleed.

Haiti was  founded in 1804 after a roundly successful slave  revolution. Aristide is Haiti's first democratically  elected President. Just before his kidnapping  at gunpoint, he had moved to double the Haitian  minimum wage. And the prospect of a dignified,  self-governing Haiti free from the depredations  of U.S. economic warfare and CIA intervention  is intolerable to the heroes of American exceptionalism.  Neoconservative ideologues, Jesse Helms-style  Southern racists, Miami exilios and organized  crime players, intelligence men embarrassed by  even a whisper of successful populism – these  are the planners of the coup and the cover-up.  Many learned their trade in the Iran-Contra period,  or have mentors who did; the pattern hasn't changed.  Just as Nicaraguan self-determination seemed to  threatened the whole universe during the Reagan  administration, from the perspective of Washington  and Langley a strong Haiti – under an electorally  legitimate Black president with a mandate and regional  allies – would surely bring the Earth crashing  into the Sun. – FTW]

Stan Goff, Master  Sergeant, U.S. Army Special Forces (Retired) is  author of Hideous Dream: A Soldier's Memoir of  the U.S. Invasion of Haiti (Soft Skull Press, 2000),  and Full Spectrum Disorder: The Military in the  New American Century Soft Skull Press, (February  9, 2004).

_____

Gonaives Adventure

March 23, 2004 1800 PST (FTW)  -- In 1994, when my last Special Forces team, Operational Detachment Alpha 354, entered the  Haitian city of Gonaives, I along with three members  of that detachment waded through a huge and agitated crowd to encounter four soldiers and two plainclothes  death squad members about to fire into that crowd  with M-1 Garands. They were surprised to see us,  and we took advantage of that surprise to compel  them to lay their weapons down and submit to arrest.  One of the plainclothes gents hesitated to relinquish  his weapon, and I came very near shooting him.  I'm only being honest – knowing  this will put some people off – when I say that I  now wish I had gone ahead and pulled the trigger.  Instead, I protected him from a very angry crowd,  one member of which lambasted him across the head  with a heavy stick when he finally laid his weapon down, obliging my own team's medics to suture his  gaping scalp laceration.

The whole tale is in Hideous Dream – A  Soldier's Memoir of the US Invasion of Haiti (Soft  Skull Press, 2000). http://www.softskull.com/detailedbook.php?isbn=1-887128-63-8

The man in question, Jean  Pierre Baptiste, goes by the alias Jean Tatoune.  Only six months before, he had participated in  a massacre in the nearby slum called Raboteau.  One participant in that massacre, Carl Dorélien,  was given refuge in the United States, where he – somehow – won  the Florida lottery in 1997. [1] Last year Jean Tatoune was busted out of jail, and now  he is acting as the paramilitary chief of Gonaives  as part of the latest successful, US-sponsored coup  d'etat  in Haiti. [2] The  leader of the massacre at Raboteau was the Gonaives  Haitian Armed Forces (FAdH) commander, Captain  Senafis Castra, with whom we were ordered to cooperate  by the Task Force commanders during the 1994 invasion.  My team's arrest of Jean Tatoune was a deviation  from the script.

Many people continue to believe  that the US supported Aristide's return to the Haitian presidency in 1994 because the Clinton  administration supported democracy. Nothing could  be further from the truth. The intelligence summaries we received during his reinstallation were violently  anti-Aristide, and the policies pursued from  Day One were designed to ensure Aristide's neutralization  as the leader of Haiti. He spent three years in  talks with the United States trying to gain support  for his return, and during that time the United  States placed increasing pressure on him – especially  by allowing the body count of the Cedras-Francois coup government to increase at the expense of Aristide  activists from the Lavalas movement he founded. It  is unlikely that the G.H.W. Bush administration would have ever put Aristide back into office.

The Iran-Contra-Cocaine-Gusano  Connection Redux

This became part of the backdrop  of the 1992 US presidential election, leading to the 1994 US military invasion that brought Aristide  back after the first US-supported coup against him.  A nd the question of Haiti has been intimately connected  to US partisan and race politics ever since. This  partisanship and race politics has involved both  American political parties, a cast of nefarious  Iran-Contra characters, and the Central Intelligence  Agency. The administration's international factotum  for the latest coup is Roger Noriega, and he's a  good starting point for any deconstruction of race,  empire, and Haiti.

Roger Noriega is the Assistant  Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs. Before that, he was the United States Ambassador  to the Organization of American States (OAS).[3] But  his career got its running start when he became an  aide in the Bureau for Inter-American Affairs  of the US State Department. Like the Office of Public  Diplomacy for Latin America, this was an instrument  of the Reagan administration's campaign to destroy  the Sandinista government of Nicaragua. Dubbed “Iran-Contra” by  the press, that campaign was being run by a coterie  of felons including Elliot Abrams, John Negroponte,  John Poindexter, and Otto Reich. [4] The  Vice President during this episode was George Herbert  Walker Bush, former Director of Central Intelligence. [5]

Reagan's Office of Public  Diplomacy was run by Otto Reich, who zealously  planted scads of bogus stories in the press – for  instance, that MiGs were being shipped to Nicaragua,  that Sandinistas were persecuting Miskito Indians – all  untrue, but never recanted by the US press. [6] Dubya  tried installing Otto Reich as Assistant Secretary  of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs during a  legislative recess, but the returning Senate refused  to renew Reich's appointment. [7] In  August 2001, the job went to Mr. Noriega; but like  so many of the Iran-Contra werewolves, Reich is back  in the government. He's now reporting directly to  Condoleezza Rice from a special post (apparently  created just for him) called “Special Envoy for Western  Hemisphere Initiatives.” He's the kind of person  they have to keep moving around: toward the middle  of the second Reagan administration when the huge  cocaine element of Iran-Contra broke into view, Reich's  deep involvement with CIA assassin Felix Rodriguez  and terrorist Luis Posada Carriles became too obvious  for the administration's comfort, and off he went.  From 1986 to 1989 Reich was US Ambassador to Venezuela,  where he tried very hard to secure the release of  the Miami-mafia airline bomber Orlando Bosch. That  downing of a civilian passenger airline from Cuba  was an act of terrorism in which Posada Carriles  had also been implicated. [8]

That's all been forgotten somehow, and Otto is back  on the government payroll. His first task for Bush  II, which he performed with admirable enthusiasm  and success, was another disinformation campaign  against the democratically elected Venezuelan government  of Hugo Chavez.[9]

One of the high-level players  in Iran-Contra was John Poindexter, a retired Navy admiral who specialized in illegal covert operations  and spying on American citizens. With Oliver North,  he engineered and oversaw the massive plot by the Reagan administration to sell weapons to Iran (despite  the public show of bitter hostility between the  US and Khomeini's Iran), ship huge quantities  of cocaine into the United States via Central America,  and use the cash to buy illegal weapons and materiel  for Nicaraguan terrorists. Congress had cut off the  funding for aid to the right-wing “Contras,” so  Poindexter, North and the others simply moved their  operation outside the government by funding it with  cocaine.

Eventually convicted of several  felonies, the good Admiral Poindexter managed to get them all thrown out in an immunity deal. He got  caught trying to destroy over 5,000 White House emails,  and was also the originator of yet another disinformation  campaign, this one directed at Libya's Col. Muammar  Qaddafi.[10] For  his sins, John Poindexter – now the Vice President  of Syntek Technologies, a surveillance technology  outfit with juicy federal contracts – was appointed  by Bush II to head up the sinister Information Awareness  Office (IAO), a subset of the Department of Defense's Defense  Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA, a favorite of Donald Rumsfeld). IAO's main task is  to vastly expand the Pentagon's capacity to spy on  A merican citizens. But from the moment Poindexter's appointment went public, the internet began to hum  with popular outrage about the IAO's domestic spying  program and Poindexter was canned.

John Negroponte is now the  United States' Ambassador to the UN. He's another Cocaine-Contra figure with a great resume for disinformation.  In 1981, USA mbassador to Honduras, Jack Binns,  made the error of reporting that the Honduran military  was engaged in death-squad activity. This did not  sit well with the Reagan administration, who never  met a right-wing Latin A merican killer they didn't  like. Binns was fired and his job went to Negroponte.  Between 1981-1985, during Negroponte's diplomatic  tenure, there was a direct correlation between  the level of military violence – especially that  of the specially US-trained “intelligence” unit  called Battalion 3-16 – and the level of military  assistance provided to Honduras by the US taxpayer:  an increase from $4 million to $77.4 million. This was when Honduras was being used as a launch platform  for the Nicaraguan Contras, as I can attest: when  I was in Ojo de Agua, Honduras, in 1991, the locals informed us that the same base at which we were working  was used by the Contras.[11]

When the Senate later questioned Negroponte in the  course of the Iran-Contra investigation, Negroponte  said he had no knowledge of Battalion 3-16 or its activities, indicating that he was either dead drunk  for four years or not actually staying in Honduras  where he was the ambassador(or, of course, that  he was lying through his teeth).

Through this whole sordid  period of death squads, the murders of nuns and Catholic clerics, arms-and-cocaine swaps, and felony-as-executive-branch-policy, the regional boss was Elliot Abrams, described  by friend and foe alike as a snarling macho asshole.  Convicted for his role in Iran-Contra as Reagan's  Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American  Affairs, Abrams was soon pardoned by George H.  W. Bush. And in what must be a sick joke, Bush  the Younger named Abrams Senior Director of the  National Security Council's “Office for Democracy, Human Rights and International Operations.”

Last December, Peter Kornbluh of  the National Archives told a Newsday reporter:"The  resurfacing of the Iran-Contra culprits has been  nothing short of Orwellian in this administration.  These are not 21st-century appointments. They are  retrograde appointments, a throwback to an era of  interventionism when the U.S. was the big bully on  the block." There is much speculation that these appointments – most intimates of the Miami-Cuban  right-wing and mafia – are a form of reciprocation  for gusano  assistance with the Florida-based  judicial coup that put George W. Bush into the Oval  Office.

While Roger Noriega has been coordinating the details  of President Aristide's forcible removal from office,  Otto Reich has run the disinformation campaign in the Organization of American States(OAS).[12]

Another institution for building  coups developed during the Reagan administration.  The CIA's covert operators had proven perfectly  capable of engineering the development of paramilitaries  and death squads, but they had proven unequal to  the task of developing political opposition to seated governments. So the National Endowment for Democracy  was established. From Third World Traveler:

The  NED was set up in the early 1980s under President  Reagan in the wake of all the negative revelations  about the CIA in  the second half of the 1970s. The latter was a  remarkable period; spurred by Watergate-the Church  committee of the Senate, the Pike committee of  the House, and the Rockefeller Commission, created  by the president, were all busy investigating the  CIA.

Seemingly every  other day there was a new headline about the discovery  of some awful thing, even criminal conduct, the  CIA had been mixed up in for years. The Agency  was getting an exceedingly bad name, and it was  causing the powers-that-be much embarrassment.  Something had to be done. What was done was not  to stop doing these awful things. Of course not.

What was done was to shift many  of these awful things to a new organization, with  a nice sounding name-The National Endowment for Democracy.

The idea was that the NED  would do somewhat overtly what the CIA had been  doing covertly for decades, and thus, hopefully,  eliminate the stigma associated with CIA covert  activities. It was a masterpiece. Of politics,  of public relations, and of cynicism.[13]

The NED has four affiliates in the  United States: the Republican Party, the Democratic  Party, the US Chamber of Commerce, and the AFL-CIO.  The NED counterparts to these three entities are  the International Republican Institute, the Democratic  Institute for International Affairs, the Center  for International Private Enterprise, and the American  Center for International Labor Solidarity. There  is strong and growing opposition within the AFL-CIO  to ACILS, which is a throwback to the bad-old-days  of Cold War business-unionism.

The job of the NED is to funnel  funds, training, and support to reactionary political groups in other countries in order to ensure political  outcomes that are favorable to the US elite. Their  most tried and true method has been to build, train, finance, and control political alliances as “oppositions” to popular  governments considered too “left” for the US.

Allen Weinstein, who helped  draft the legislation establishing NED, was quite candid  when he said in 1991:"A lot of what we do today was done  covertly 25 years ago by the CIA." In effect,  the CIA has been laundering money through NED.  (Ibid.) 

The National Endowment for  Democracy was invented by the Reagan administration  as a specialized outgrowth of the CIA's covert  operations apparatus. In emulation of the CIA's  now-famous string of murderous successes from Guatemala  to Chile, Indonesia to Iran, NED's mission is to  engineer “desirable” political/electoral  outcomes in other countries.

The  Helms School

US policy right now is  in the hands of the ideologues. You cannot overestimate  the relevance of these people in shaping US policy.  In a sense the Helms school of Haitian strategy  is at work here.

- Larry Birns, director of the  Council on Hemispheric Affairs

Roger Noriega's public antipathy  for Aristide began while Aristide was in office  the first time, when Noriega was working as a senior  advisor to the OAS. This public opposition to  Aristide – and Noriega's  connections with Miami's organized crime reactionaries – led  to an appointment to the staff of the arch-racist  Senator from my very own North Carolina, Jesse Helms.[14]

Helms was a personal friend to and  open supporter of Salvadoran death-squad commandante  Roberto  D' Aubuisson, believed to have planned the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero, one of the many outrages  that occurred in Latin America on the Reagan watch.[15]

Active opposition to Aristide by  Helms and Roger Noriega began at the very moment  of A ristide's surprise election victory in 1990,  when he overwhelmingly defeated the US-backed Haitian  presidential candidate, Marc Bazin, a World Bank executive. This election made Aristide the first  democratically elected president of in Haitian history.[16]

Helms' antipathy to Aristide  is double-edged: Helms regards any form of independence,  any populism, any policy that makes inroads against  the power of the rich, to be “communist.” Helms  frequently referred to Aristide as a “Haitian Castro.” And Jesse Helms  just plain doesn't like Black people. Foreign, Black, Catholic, and populist – the only thing missing for  the pure embodiment of evil according to Helms would  be if Aristide were gay; Helms is also a notorious homophobe.[17] In  the South, where political hegemony has been exercised  ever since the Nixon presidency, there is a long  standing belief that unions, race-mixing, and communism  are identical, and this remains Helms' view today.  One of the Ku Klux Klan's principal appeals forty  years ago(when Hoover's FBI was very much at home  with the good ole boys) was that they were a bulwark  against communism – which they opposed because communists  promoted racial “mongrelization.”[18] Maybe  Roger Noriega shares Mr. Helms' special political pathology. But it's more likely that our new Assistant  Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs  is driven by his self-perception as a guardian of  the empire in Latin America, and shaped by his origins  in that particular region of the South that is Miami.

The former U.S. Ambassador  to El Salvador, Robert White, was among those  fired by Reagan for speaking out on human rights  violations. Just days before the present coup d'etat  culminated with the Aristide's removal and detention  by the U.S. Marines, White commented: “ Roger Noriega  has been dedicated to ousting Aristide for many,  many years, and now he's in a singularly powerful  position to accomplish it."

Recalling the Helms-Noriega efforts  to prevent Aristide's return to Haiti in 1994, Dr.  Heather Williams wrote in Haiti as Target Practice:  How the US Press Missed the Story:

As senior staff member  for the Committee on Foreign Relations of the  U.S. Senate, and advisor to Senator Jesse Helms  and John Burton, he [Roger Noriega] was party  to a three-year campaign to defame Aristide  and prevent his return to power; all the while  CIA-backed thugs left carnage in the streets  daily in Port Au Prince. In his capacity in  the State Department since 2003, and for two  years before that as the U.S. Permanent Representative  to the OAS, he has aggressively advertised  his intention to oust Aristide a second time.  For example, in April of last  year, speaking at the Council of the Americas  conference in Washington, he linked U.S. policies  in Haiti to those in Venezuela and Cuba … He  added that"President Chavez and President  Aristide have contributed willfully to a polarized  and confrontational environment. It is my fervent  hope," he added ominously,"that the good people of Cuba are  studying [this]."[19]

While there is no doubt that the Reagan administration  was a shaker and mover in Latin America and the Caribbean,  to really get at the roots of covert operations, coups d'etat, and the connections to race-politics  in the United States, we have to go back just a bit  further.

Plan Condor

In 1948, the CIA inaugurated  its “Office of Policy  Coordination,”(OPC) headed up by Frank Wisner, a  Wall Street lawyer (the deep-political connection  between Wall Street and the CIA has been the subject  of several books, and should be the subject of several  more). The OPC's responsibilities included, in its  own words,"propaganda, economic warfare, preventive  direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage,  demolition and evacuation procedures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground  resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-communist  elements in threatened countries of the free world." [20] In  the 1960's one of the targets of these operations  was a new Haitian leader named Francois Duvalier.  This is a not-well-known fact on the right or the  left in the United States, who only seem to remember  when Papa Doc(Duvalier's infamous nickname) and  the CIA were working together. But if we don't understand  this, we cannot understand Haitian- American relations,  so I will return to this subject further down.[21]

In the wake of the economic crisis  caused by Vietnam, the US colonial playground called  Latin America took on a new significance. The story  of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger's involvement  in the 1973 CIA-supported coup d'etat  against democratically elected President Salvador Allende  in Chile is well known. What is not so well remembered  is that John Negroponte was the US Ambassador to  the UN in 1972, as was George Bush the Elder in 1973.  Bush took over the CIA in 1975. At that time, DCI  Bush launched Plan Condor, designed to wipe out  political opposition to US-supported regimes in Latin  America. As part of Condor, the green light was  given to the then-fascist government of Argentina  to slaughter 30,000 political opponents between 1976  and 1983.

Who were some of the shakers and  movers for Plan Condor? Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada  Carriles, the future gusano  bombers of  a civilian passenger airliner.

These are some of the bloodiest  personnel behind the many right-wing seizures of power in Latin America and the Caribbean. In  fact, the Argentinean military helped train Negroponte's  unacknowledged Honduran Battalion 3-16. The US  was assisted liberally in its training of repressive  forces in the region by the Israelis, who seemed  weirdly indifferent to the fact that the Argentinean  military tortured Jewish prisoners under portraits  of Hitler to enhance the intimidation effect. But then the Israelis were staunch supporters of racist  South Africa then as well. Israel actually set  up a Galil assault rifle factory in Guatemala,  and when I was there for the last coup in 1983,  the Galil was the most popular weapon in the country.  The strong relation between Israel and the modern-day  Zionist neocons – whatever their various religious and ethnic identities, be  it noted – is not new. The centrality of the Saudis  is not new either.

This consortium of forces  (Saudis, Israelis, CIA, Contras, and local reactionaries  in Latin American and the Caribbean) was laundering  money through the phony Bank of Commerce and Credit  International(BCCI), which had links – too numerous  and complex to recount here – with the bin Ladens  and the Bush family; that money was being used  to finance covert operations. BCCI collapsed after  revelations about its connections to the Medellin  cartel of Colombia brought down the whole house  of cards. [22] These  would become the key players in the Iran-Contra-Cocaine  affair because, as we say among activists, organizing  is based on relationships.[23]

There are those critics out  there who will, at this juncture, say this is conspiracy theorizing, and that conspiracy theory is somehow  the antithesis of class analysis. At the risk  of seeming rude, let me say that this is idiotic.  It is a false dichotomy. To pretend dominant classes  exist as some kind of autonomous abstraction without  any personal agency inside a deterministic system  ignores that members of any social class are people.  To assume that these people do not scheme to protect  their class interests – or  that we should not concern ourselves with how those  schemes work – strikes me as a recipe for inaction.[24]

There is a very good reason why  the CIA continually works with drug traffickers. The money is untraceable. They don't take  the  drugs. My experience is that they work out of embassies  and are addicted to embassy fare – Scotch and martinis. And they don't sell the drugs. They facilitate and  skim. George W. Bush, however… well, never mind.

US  Domestic Partisan Politics – The Southern Strategy

Since the late 19 th Century,  when Reconstruction was dismantled, the Democratic  Party had openly and proudly claimed to be “the Party of White Supremacy,” and  Republicans – still identified with Lincoln, and  therefore with Blacks – were incapable of getting  elected in the South.[25] Kennedy  and Johnson were seen as the great betrayers, and  the Republican Party sensed an opening.

In 1968, the Nixon campaign  fell upon an electoral strategy that would create  a tectonic political shift, the “Southern Strategy.”[26] Southern  white racists perceived the end of Jim Crow(the  legal system of Southern US apartheid) as a catastrophic  threat to their privileged status. Outbreaks of their  bitter resentment were called “white backlash” in  the press. Barry Goldwater, the reactionary Senator  from Arizona who was trounced by Lyndon Johnson  in 1964 was rabidly opposed to the Civil Rights Act.  In spite of his poor showing nationwide, he showed  his greatest strength in the South, as did independent  segregationist George Wallace.

The barely coded appeal used  by Goldwater, who didn't feel empowered to call  as openly as Wallace for a return to legal apartheid,  was “states' rights,” understood by every white Southerner as the battle cry in defense  of slavery and its legacy. Out of Goldwater's wreckage,  Nixon built the Republican strategy that has won overwhelming support from Southern white voters since  LBJ went back to the ranch. African American political  critic Lee Hubbard writes:

"Substantial Negro support is not necessary  to national Republican victory," said Kevin  Phillips, the mastermind behind Nixon's Southern  Strategy, at the time."The GOP can build  a winning coalition without Negro Votes. Indeed,  Negro-Democratic mutual identification was a major  source of Democratic loss, and Republican Party  or(George Wallace's) American Independent Party  profit, in many sections of the country."

Since then, some Republicans  have played to these fears to gather white votes. Their game has ranged from the kickoff of Ronald  Reagan's presidential campaign when he declared  he"believed in  states rights," in Philadelphia, Mississippi  -- the site of the deaths of civil rights martyrs  Schwerner, Chaney, and Goodman -- to Vice President's  Bush's 1988 Willie Horton ad campaign, which basically  depicted all blacks as being criminals. Some of  the GOP's race-baiting has been, perhaps, unintentional,  and at other times it has been blatant, but it  has happened, and black people are familiar with  this list of racial baggage.[27]

Richard Nixon's campaign effected the decisive transfer  of the potent political mantle of white supremacy  from the Democratic Party to the Republicans. It  is important to understand that foreign policy is  not solely determined by foreign priorities, either  economic or strategic. It is also significantly influenced  by its impact on popular domestic political bases.

HAITIAN  HISTORY, VENEZUELA AND WHITE MEN'S FEARS

This is particularly relevant  to Haiti. The Haitian Revolution that culminated  in the first Black Republic on January 1, 1804,  was fought against three imperial powers, including  Napoleon's armed forces, by rebel slaves. These  slaves out-generaled, out-administered, and out-fought  the European giants, smashing the myth of white  supremacy. This struck terror into the American  South, where the fear of Black rebellion was a  constant obsession. Turmoil in Haiti is always  portrayed by the American mainstream press in  a way that explains as little as possible, so as to reinforce the impression of amorphous chaos – read:  Black deviance and incapacity for self-governance.  That tactic has distracted the television-drugged US public from yet another coup attempt afoot, the  second in less than two years, in Venezuela. I h  av e read do zen s of articles over the last few  days on both Haiti and Venezuela, and none of them  mentions race or racism as a factor in these coup  attempts. This is an elephant in the living room.  Unfortunately, most Americans in the living room  h av e been blindfolded.

In 1994, just before the United  States launched the invasion of Haiti that became my last deployment, Paul Farmer published an excellent  book called The  Uses of Haiti.[28] He  described America's horrifically successful Haitian  policy of blaming the victim while continuing to  strangle him. For instance, it's often pointed out that Haiti's capital city, Port-au-Prince is overpopulated,  jerrybuilt, and afflicted by almost irremediable  drainage and waste-disposal problems. Huge numbers  of peasants continually leave the countryside in  search of work in the city, forming overcrowded,  sprawling bidonvilles (shantytowns) with  little or no potable water or electricity. But mainstream  American papers rarely go on to explain what drives this process: as foreign agribusiness disrupted the  Haitian sharecropping system, land enclosure and  mechanization(as well as terrible soil erosion)  forced more and more people off the land and into  the cities to seek work that was not available except  to a very few(accounting for the criminally low  wages paid in Port-au-Prince by foreign manufacturers).  Paradoxically, the Artibonnite valley which grows enough rice to feed Haiti ships most of its product  abroad to get export dollars, and the US ships(taxpayer  subsidized) rice into Haiti at prices most Haitians  can ill afford.

So Haiti is strangled by the Washington  economic consensus(neoliberalism), then blamed for  not getting its act together, because most Americans  haven't a clue what these international trade policies  are or how they work.

And that's just the economic assault.  The biggest fear of the right wing and its para-political  gangs is a strong effort by the Haitian state to  establish the rule of law within its sovereign territory.  This becomes incredibly difficult when weapons and  equipment for the police are embargoed, and the 75%  urban unemployment rate forces large numbers of people  into various criminal enterprises to survive.

In the wake of the latest coup, Haiti is an utter  legal shambles.

[Aside: Though this is often overstated  inside Haiti, the country has become one of many  regional stepping stones for drug-running operations  in this hemisphere. This will now get considerably  worse, since many of the FRAPH hoodlums were deeply  involved in drug trafficking. Just as South-Central  Los Angeles was chosen as the CIA's ideal market  for its Contra-funding crack-cocaine bakesale, we  can reasonably expect that Haiti will now be prized  by those same forces for the same reasons. It's now  a stateless milieu whose legal infrastructure has  been so degraded that it offers political criminals  a path of least resistance.]

This process has served as an important  ideological pillar for white supremacy in the United  States. From slavery to Jim Crow, to the de facto  segregation that easily survived the Civil Rights  Movement, white America has profited from racist ideology and the economic crimes it was invented  to legitimize. Haiti's successful slave revolution  at the dawn of the 19th Century shook that ideology,  and prompted economic and political attacks by both  France and the United States.

As Paul Farmer and other critics  have shown, the message of the American press remains  essentially racist and colonial; Haiti is subtly  but unmistakably represented as inscrutably mad,  animalistic, diseased, and deviant.

Ever since Nixon managed the  Republican Party's displacement of the Democrats as the party of white supremacy, Republicans have  taken a special responsibility for putting Haiti  in its place. Just after Aristide's ouster, Florida  Republican Mark Foley, in a CNN exchange with the  priceless Maxine Waters, said the US will help Haitians  learn how to run a government and “how  to grow crops.” A white f--king rich man from Florida,  whom the website Democratic Underground named Number  Two on its Top Ten Conservative Idiots  list,  is talking about teaching Haitians how to grow  crops![29]

Note that the US-selected heir apparent  in this coup is a white Haitian, Andre A, paid a  Duvalierist sweatshop tycoon who has an American  passport.[30] The  last US appointee after the last coup d'etat  was  light-skinned Raoul Cedras. This is a reflection  of the still complicated class-race interfusion in  Haiti, but also of a comfort threshold among American  patrons – which would include craven opportunists  like Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice. Race serves  class:  Duvalier came to power using a nationalistic appeal  to black consciousness(“ noirisme ”), and  ruled in behalf of the nationalistic big landowners  in Haiti, whose way of life was threatened by US-sponsored  capitalist agriculture(as opposed to the semi-feudal  sharecropping system that enriched these grandons (big  landowners). That mechanized capitalist agriculture  was introduced to Haiti under the rule of the US Marine occupation from 1915-1934, as was the brutal  Haitian National Guard, whom Duvalier distrusted  and many of whom participated in a failed coup attempt against Duvalier(supported by the CIA). It was  in response to the political unreliability of the  Haitian armed forces that Duvalier developed the  Gestapo-like Tonton Macoute militia to impose by  terror a political discipline not only on the population  but on the armed forces until he could redevelop  its leaders and members into a force more consistently  loyal to him.

It was the Tonton Macoute  that gave Duvalier his fierce reputation, and which Duvalier would eventually use on behalf of US interests,  when he and the US later mended their fences in  exchange for his massacre of leftists in Haiti  and his regional support of US “anti-communist” efforts.

Duvalier's authoritarian brutality then served him  to control the Haitian population, as well as serving  US interests in the region. It also had the added benefit in the US, unintended by the noiriste  despot,  of providing ideological support to white supremacy  by reinforcing notions of Black brutishness.[31]

White privilege and white supremacy  are still embraced at some level by the majority  of the white US population.[32] This  embrace is not always the same as it was – unconcealed  and unabashed – under Jim Crow or in South Africa  during Apartheid. More often it is coded, socially  inscribed through the erasure of history, ideologically  inscribed as erasure of the social construction of  individual agency(personal responsibility, etc.),  and psychologically inscribed with Negrophobia – the  personal internalization of racial stereotypes that  regards Black male bodies as predatory, Black female  bodies as hypersensual, and Black intellect as inferior.  This is one of the foundation stones of Republican  Party success.[33]

I know some on the left will  take me to task for emphasizing race by insisting  that class is the deeper issue, but I don't buy  it. When we can extricate the two in any but a  theoretical way, I'll give this class-over-race  argument another listen. White supremacy has been  and remains a pillar of Euro- American power,  and not in some merely discursive way that “divides  and conquers” workers, though that's certainly part  of it. And imperialism is the issue, too, rationalized  through notions of the “white man's burden.”

Bush  the Elder and Clinton on Haiti

During the 1992 election, Bill Clinton  excoriated George W. Bush for his incarceration of  Haitian refugees in the concentration camp at Guantanamo  Bay, Cuba. Playing to his Black audience, whom Clinton  would betray in his later policies at every turn,  Clinton also pointed quite justifiably to the hypocrisy  of allowing white Cubans automatic entry into the  US, while indefinitely detaining black Haitians.[34]

The coup of a year earlier was proceeding apace  with its slaughter of Aristide loyalists and grassroots  organizers, and CIA complicity in the coup was becoming gradually more visible with a leak here and a whisper  there.

Then the economy tanked after  George H. W. Bush had made his famed “read my lips” remark,  and Bill Clinton was elected.

Faced with the reality of Haiti's desperation and  the volume of refugees fleeing the Cedras-Francois  regime, and faced with the reality of Florida politics  and the possibility of 100,000 or more penniless  people crashing onto its shores, Bill Clinton's first  foreign policy embarrassment was being forced by  his circumstances to treat the Haitians even more  harshly than the Bush regime had.

My own unit in 1993 was preparing  for an invasion of Haiti to re-install a reined-in Aristide, but the debacle in Somalia put the whole  plan on hold for a year. While Haitians had originally  elected Aristide because of his opposition to  predatory neoliberal policies, Clinton now convinced  Aristide to support those same policies in order  to stop the killing. Clinton knew very well that  a US invasion would not be accepted by the people  of Haiti without Aristide – their first democratically  elected President, whom they now saw as a symbol  of their aspiration for genuine independence.

Aristide was to be re-installed  on October 30, 1993, according to an agreement between  Cedras and Clinton called the Governor's Island accords  (please see: http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/briefing/dossec/1993/9310/931011dossec.html). The USS Harlan County, carrying the military  and State Department facilitators, arrived in Port-au-Prince  on October 11 th. But the officials who were designated to meet the craft had been replaced by a handful  of FRAPH thugs(some of them drunk) waving pistols  and threatening to fire on anyone who disembarked.  So the USS Harlan County, an American  warship, was turned about and sent home by a band  of intoxicated bullies with Colt.45s. This was a  tremendous foreign policy embarrassment for President  Bill Clinton, who was at a loss to explain the situation  to the public.

This bizarre incident was rendered  even more fantastic by the nonchalant presence of  the American John Kambourian on the docks, unafraid  and unthreatened by the ostensible anti-American  gang. Kambourian was leaning on his vehicle with  a kind of Delphic smirk throughout this whole weird  interlude. Documentary film maker Katherine Kean  was on hand and secretly videotaped him.

Kambourian was the CIA's  man on station. He had been sitting in the car  with UN representative Vickie Huddleston, and the  FRAPHists made a kind of show of banging on the  hood and shouting, “Kill whites!” for  the cameras. Neither Huddleston nor Kambourian seemed  alarmed, nor did Huddleston attempt to leave. It  was only later, when they didn't realize Kean had  a running camera, that Kambourian exited the car  to catch some air and suppress a smile at the little performance. The FRAPH, after all, were Kambourian's  boys. In dissecting the current coup, we will see  that the FRAPH is back in Haiti, and that this  year they provided the paramilitary terrorism that  precipitated the forcible removal of Aristide… again.

Present during the 1993 USS  Harlan County fiasco  was the chief of the FRAPH, Emmanuel “Toto” Constant.  Only later would the public learn that Constant was on the CIA payroll before, during, and after the  1991 coup d'etat. Little wonder Kambourian  was so comfortable relaxing outside during the Harlan  County  “riot.” Constant  was taken in by the United States and now lives in  Queens, NY collecting Happy Meal toys and(by many  accounts) spending happy hours with his local cocaine  dealers. His threats to expose his CIA relations  pressured the US into protecting him from extradition.[35]

Note that in this episode the CIA  was subverting its own Director. There is no indication  that R. James Woolsey, the newly appointed DCI was  complicit in Kambourian's fake riot; in fact, it  would be surprising if he were. He was a Clinton appointee, and like the next Clinton DCI, John Deutch,  he served on the Boards of Directors of various big  Defense contractors. The transparently orchestrated sabotage of Clinton's Haiti policy was probably  the work of the field agents within the CIA who  move up to become station chiefs. By and large, their  politics are racist and reactionary, if my own association  with them is any indication. I never once met an  exception. They are certainly nothing like the Tom  Clancy caricatures we see in the movies. I invite  readers to read my own accounts in Full Spectrum Disorder – The  Military in the New American Century (Soft  Skull Press, 2004) http://www.softskull.com/detailedbook.php?isbn=1-932360-12-3.  This Republican bias, which included a Jesse Helms-like  aversion to both Haiti and Aristide, was prevalent  among white officers in the military during the 1994  invasion, and among white Special Operations personnel.

Bush the Elder – former Director  of Central Intelligence – had  his vengeance on Bill Clinton with the Harlan  County  incident.  Clinton was likely reluctant to call anyone's bluff  on issues related to the CIA, because he himself  was vulnerable on his own complicity in another CIA  operation, which we have mentioned earlier: Iran-Contra.  His was not a central role, but given the cocaine  politics of the Agency in its efforts to destroy  the Sandinistas, it was more than a little discomfiting.

Suite de l'article à :
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/032304_haiti_pt1.html
_____________________

Endnotes:

[1] http://www.cja.org/cases/dorelien.shtml

 [2] http://news.amnesty.org/mav/index/ENGAMR360062004

 [3] For Roger Noriega’s official bio page, see: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/4708.htm

 [4] For notes on Roger Noriega’s nomination to his current job, see: http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0305/S00064.htm

 [5] http://www.geocities.com/iran_contra_christic_institute

 [6] For a rich trove of original documents from Reich’s appalling career in the Reagan years, see: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB40/

 [7] Blocking Reich’s nomination wasn’t easy:

http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~border/list_articles/030901_nytimes_bush.htmllink

 [8] http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3354.htm

 [9] http://www.trinicenter.com/world/venez/lessons.shtml

 [10] http://www.hereinreality.com/bigbrother.html

 [11] http://www.geocities.com/ravencrazy/Negroponte.html

 [12] http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0403/S00047.htm

 [13] http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/National%20EndowmentDemo.html

 [14] http://www.indystar.com/articles/0/125879-8940-P.html

 [15] http://www.fair.org/press-releases/helms.html ;  http://www.icomm.ca/carecen/page70.html

 [16] http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/haiti/2004/0302typical.htm

 [17] http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A10822-2001Aug28?language=printer

 [18] http://www.epwijnants-lectures.com/ct_ku_klux_klan.html

 [19] http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/articles.php?artno=1117

 [20] http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Plan_Condor

 [21] http://www.counterpunch.org/goff02142004.html

 [2
2] http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2003/01/26515.php

 [23] One of the major branches of the recent revolution in computer programming is called Network theory. It was the basis of PROMIS software and it now constitutes a vast research discipline of its own, whose primary organization is the International Network for Social Network Analysis: http://www.sfu.ca/~insna/. Applications include Namebase software(http://www.namebase.org/), terrorist tracking(http://www.sfu.ca/~insna/INSNA/Hot/terrorist.htm), and the mapping of complex webs of economic and political influence – “social capital” – through informal ties(http://www.sfu.ca/~insna/INSNA/Hot/soc_cap.htm).

    [24]   http://www.sonic.net/~doretk/Issues/96-06%20JUNE/terrorismhypeparenti.html

 [25] Comer Vann Woodward, The Strange Career of Jim Crow. Oxford University Press; 3rd Revision edition September 1989; latest edition 2001.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0195146905/qid=1079842032/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-4006561-4479011?v=glance&s=books

 [26] http://www.counterpunch.org/vest1220.html

 [27] http://speakout.com/activism/opinions/5670-1.html

 [28] http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Caribbean/Uses_Abuses_Haiti.html

 [29] http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/02/84.html

 [30] http://www.workers.org/ww/2004/haiti0304.php

 [31] http://www.webster.edu/~corbetre/haiti/history/course/unitone/short.htm

 [32] http://www.kersplebedeb.com/mystuff/books/collectiveliberation/beyond.html

 [33] http://www.straybulletins.com/LMB/weblog/archive/000758.html

 [3
4] http://www.thirdworltraveler.com/Chomsky/ChomskyOdonian_Haiti.html

 [35] http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2001/06/grann.htm

 
 

Communication

undefined

Vient de sortir ...
Un document inédit sur la mémoire haïtienne
Les textes de Roland Paret et Frantz Voltaire
 sont accompagnés de photos de l'époque.
Prix: 10 euros
En vente au restaurant  haïtien:
Le Rond Point des Artistes/Tel 01 48 09 88 40

Recommander

W3C

  • Flux RSS des articles
Créer un blog sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Rémunération en droits d'auteur - Signaler un abus - Articles les plus commentés